Recent searches
Search options
So heartwarming and encouraging to see a judge follow the rule of law this time in regards to #TuckerCarlsonIsATraitor
#TuckerCarlsonGotFired & the #QAnonShaman. — https://mpost.tribel.com/public/posts/c93b46d0-2731-11ee-9ede-2beff1538f70
TribelBREAKING: Federal judge blasts disgraced former FOX News host Tucker Carlson, denies the “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley’s request to throw out his conviction over the cherry-picked videos aired by Tucker Carlson.
But it gets even WORSE for Tucker Carlson and the “QAnon Shaman”…
In a blistering 35-page opinion, the judge declared Chansley’s sentence should be INCREASED rather than reduced — and then set his sights on Tucker Carlson.
The judge declared, “Not only was Mr. Carlson’s broadcast replete with misstatements and misrepresentations regarding the events of January 6, 2021 too numerous to count, Mr. Carlson explicitly questioned the integrity of this Court — not to mention the legitimacy of the entire U.S. criminal justice system — with inflammatory characterizations of cherry-picked videos stripped of their proper context. In so doing, he called on his followers to ‘reject the evidence of [their] eyes and ears,’ language resembling the destructive, misguided rhetoric that fueled the events of January 6 in the first place.
The Court finds it alarming that the host’s viewers throughout the nation so readily heeded his command. But this Court cannot and will not reject the evidence before it. Nor should the public.”
BREAKING: Federal judge blasts disgraced former FOX News host Tucker Carlson, denies the “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley’s request to throw out his conviction over the cherry-picked videos aired by Tucker Carlson.
But it gets even WORSE for Tucker Carlson and the “QAnon Shaman”…
In a blistering 35-page opinion, the judge declared Chansley’s sentence should be INCREASED rather than reduced — and then set his sights on Tucker Carlson.
The judge declared, “Not only was Mr. Carlson’s broadcast replete with misstatements and misrepresentations regarding the events of January 6, 2021 too numerous to count, Mr. Carlson explicitly questioned the integrity of this Court — not to mention the legitimacy of the entire U.S. criminal justice system — with inflammatory characterizations of cherry-picked videos stripped of their proper context. In so doing, he called on his followers to ‘reject the evidence of [their] eyes and ears,’ language resembling the destructive, misguided rhetoric that fueled the events of January 6 in the first place.
The Court finds it alarming that the host’s viewers throughout the nation so readily heeded his command. But this Court cannot and will not reject the evidence before it. Nor should the public.”